Board Thread:Survivor 41: Phi Pan Nam/@comment-28545345-20191012020306

I'd like to say congrats to both of you to making it to the end!! I think you both played great games and should be proud of making it all 39 days. I also want to thank the hosts for a great game as well!!

Mine will be on the shorter side as I truly just want some clarifications on your guys' games.

Both-  If you could make a DVD cover with six players, who would be on the front and why? Include both of you guys so there would be four more spots for people.

Shane- For me, I can understand the loyalty towards Tyler because I do know you as a player, but when people are saying that Tyler is a huge threat to win, why take him to the finale? You played a great game too but at the end of the day, it shows me that perhaps Tyler had a stronger control over you than for you to make the most logical decision and vote him out.

I also want you to highlight some of the moves you made during your time in the game, so specific instances in which you took the reins of the game and changed it to better fit your own agenda. I think you, Shane, made a lot more game moves than Tyler did and was much more dynamic as a player so I want you to highlight this part of your game.

Tyler- I think you had a great social game, even during the game, which was why I wanted to eliminate you asap so I could break some people out of your bonds. But for me, I didn't see you make moves to further yourself. Perhaps your social bonds were strong enough for people to do the work for you, but then shouldn't we reward the people who were flipping people and making the moves in the merge? I just want more clarification if you soelly relied on those socila bonds, or if there were big instances of strategic moments that you led the charge for some of the vote offs.

I think you both are amazing and congrats once again! 