Board Thread:Survivor: Canada (Season 9)/@comment-17738489-20150626152234/@comment-24114312-20150627093007

'''What were your own plans in game with me? Did you consider me as a F2 partner since the beginning as i did? Did you plan to flip on me at some point or on other nains? What was your perfect F2 for you since the merge and how did it change and if it changed?''' - I was mad after Brian's vote out, and I honestly thought I was on the bottom for a bit, so I went to Jack and basically said that if he kept me safe, I'd give him my vote. Then when Ryan flipped and I realised I didn't have to anymore (alongside the fact the Okaks voted me), I didn't. And my perfect F2 was probably going to be you or Scott - both were huge threats, but both deserved it and were fairly close to me during the game.

Compare every juror in this season to a survivor player, considering just this season:

Jack - For Jack I would go with Jeff Kent from Philippines. Jeff Kent had a strong strategic and social game, but was taken out early in the merge because of that, and I think that relates strongly to Jack.

Ryan - Jonathan Penner from Cook Islands. Not so much personality wise, but Ryan flipped just like Penner did, then the leaders of each alliance (Yul in Cook Islands, Szymon in Canada) voted them out.

Szymon - Taj from Tocantins. Taj went into the merge in a minority but managed to turn it around for the Jalapaos and was a strategic force to be reckoned with, but fell just short. I think that relates to you perfectly.

Lukas - I view Lukas a bit like Natalie Bolton from Micronesia. She wasn't an obvious threat early on, but as the game progressed she became more and more integral and by the end of it, was a key part in the season. At least for me, I didn't realise Lukas was such a huge threat until very late in the game.

Scott - Ciera from Blood vs. Water. Scott is much more trustworthy than Ciera, but Ciera was in a majority alliance that crumbled (much like the Nains) and had to go to a tiebreaker too (it was rocks though, not a fire-making challenge). She also had a solid strategic and social grasp on the game, much like Scott.

Bjorn - For me, Bjorn was like Sabrina from One World. Sabrina was a huge part of One World, and had the season been any different she would've easily won. I think this relates to Bjorn and also, Sabrina was a strong part of her alliance, but wasn't given as much credit as others and I also think that's the case with Bjorn.