Board Thread:Survivor: Canada (Season 9)/@comment-4387136-20150625212319/@comment-24114312-20150625224109

"Did you only play loyally because you we're so busy IRL and a little bit inactive?" - No, I'd analysed the situation at Final 9 and contemplated flipping them and figured that if any Nain was gonna be taken out, it would be Szymon. However if I flipped (with NJ since me and her had spoken) and voted out Szymon or another Nain 9th, I was going to end with 6th at highest. The only real other chance I had to flip was final 5, and once again then I viewed Tyler/Bjorn as biggest threats than Scott/Lukas. I'd also planned that at F4, in the situation that Tyler went at F5, I'd vote with Bjorn and set myself for a guaranteed F3 - as Bjorn would take me for saving him and the other Nain would take me because Bjorn would win. I also wanted to see what being loyal was like because it's a very rare thing to see from me, and I liked it (plus I got better results lmao).

"As an Okak who worked with you once, why do you think I, just me, deserve your vote? Like what reasons do you think, after all my statements and all my questions and our short time together, would I have to vote for you?" - I think you summed it up perfectly in your speech why I deserve your vote. Despite only being with you in the game for 3 votes and having personal issues going on, I still managed to talk more game with you than Tyler did. I also showed in one of the conversations we had that I was thinking strategically even though I had limited time and that I was willing to share those thoughts.

"For both of you: Who's move was it more to take Jamie to the end? Like did, you, Jamie, do a lot of convincing, or did you, Tyler, want an "easy" win?" - I think it was Tyler's decision mainly since he won immunity and intrinsically it was his decision, but I feel I analysed our situation and helped convince him in the way I deemed best. Me/Tyler spoke a fair amount during the Final Immunity Challenge. For example, Tyler came to me and asked who I would take, and while I was pretty undecided (both Tyler and Bjorn had value to bring to the end) I made it seem I was set on taking Tyler, hoping it would give me some form of brownie points. I made sure not to bug him though, and only checked up on our deal once or twice since I didn't wanna annoy him away. I also chose to speak to Tyler more (and not Bjorn) as I thought Tyler stood more chance of winning immunity over Bjorn and if I went to Bjorn and said things like "Tyler's the biggest threat to win! We have to vote him out!" and then Tyler won immunity, I'd be screwed. Moreover, when explaining to Tyler why I would take him, I was very complimentary of him and very self-depricating but not in a campaigning way, I tried to appear like it was 100% casual and not strategic through saying stuff like "I'm pretty sure I'm gonna lose either way and I'd want you to win since it'd be cute to see you win on 703 [:" (on if I won final immunity). I felt like while it was Tyler's decision, I viewed the situation and chose the best social route to get me to FTC.