Board Thread:Survivor: Siem Reap (Season 13)/@comment-5001881-20151210003045/@comment-25580549-20151210005053

Why should Charley take me to the final 2: A short speech by Nathan P. Cooper

Well it comes down to this. 38 days played together and there's a chance you're writing my name down. We all know how important the final 3 vote is. You're basically picking whether you win or whether you lose. Or you win either way in which case who you pick doesn't matter in the slightest. But here's why you should take me over Hannah. Basically if you both make the FTC, Hannah is going to argue that you two both played the same game, and that she worked from a minority vote premerge to a tight alliance that made up all of the final 3. She managed to make the end without having to win a single challenge and is a generally sweet person, while also being bluntly honest. She can make an amazing argument. However, with me, I was basically the Sierra of the premerge. The Pailins came to me to make a move and almost every single time I turned them down and voted them out, including Kaffe, who I promised I wouldn't vote out. The one time I tried to make a move, with Jake, it failed miserably and he went home. This isn't horseshoes. The jury doesn't award the finalists based on what they tried, just on what they accomplished, and look at my accomplishments: no challenges to my name except a luck based challenge, the target of the minority and only saved from a tie because of YOUR idol (How would it look if you saved me twice?), and made false promises that were wavery and made me appear like a flake. A jury would not want to vote for me, and if you take me, you'd probably win decisively. Ultimately, though, I'll respect your decision but I just hope you decide to take me to my first FTC.