Board Thread:Big Brother 10/@comment-27992076-20191003073141/@comment-2606:A000:4341:A600:1023:3097:CFCA:D832-20191003230325

Bradley - For you, there was a lot of reasons. As it's been pointed out, you were quite inactive early on for the first two or three rounds of the game. This, of course, put you on the bottom of the house, because it's not like you had built a solid foundation of social capital to spend throughout the game and then went inactive afterwards. You were saved Week 3 narrowly and did set yourself up with some good allies, but you were always on the bottom of those people. To add onto that, you were the target of many on the other side because of a poor social game and lack of game awareness to realize that it might be better for you to bridge the gap earlier than you did around the time of your eventual eviction. I would say that my advice is to work on how you communicate with people as well as how you start games, because your awkward nature in the beginning put you off totally and while there are people that can rebound, I don't think you had it in you this season to pull that off.

Quintin - Honestly, the reason why you got evicted when you did was because Sam won Veto that week. Had he not or had you won Veto, you would have gone farther. Your issues though, like some of the others I've named, was that you neglected to really jump sides and stuck with your alliance too long. It's what happens when you stick with a sinking ship and don't have enough connections on the outside to give your game buoyancy. Adaptability and manueverability are two of my pieces of advice for you.

Maya - The lack of a solid strategic game hurt you. I don't want to make assumptions, but based on the question that was posed to me, I will. You didn't do enough in my opinion to make you stand out on your own. You were constantly being billed as someone who was a third to many pairs, as well as someone who didn't have a strong social game either. I know your timezone got in the way, but I feel like my advice to you would be having a better foundation of a social game so that you are not nominated constantly in the beginning as well as making moves in your best interest and not just for the group you're with.

Abi - Like Maya, a lack of a strategic and social game hurt you. I'm not saying either of you were bad players, but I do think that you both had this perception that people could drag you to the end because they knew they could beat you. I have the same advice for you as I do for her.

Bryce - You played a good game, but it was obvious that you were playing a good game. Also, you reconnecting with Szymon at the end out of nowhere (according to what I've been told) was not smart because Szymon and Sam were much closer and I do think you had a solid chance to beat myself and Natalia possibly in the end based on jury votes. I would say think out moves a lot more clearly next time and try not to become obsessed with everyone having to like you. You're going to have enemies, and it's best that you make them or else you get into situations like these where you get taken out for being a threat.

Natalia - You also played a good game. Ultimately, I think it was just that you didn't have as good of a relationship with Sam that cost you to be voted out. Also, of our pairing, I feel like you were more likely to be targeted over me since people knew that you were actively double dealing and being two-faced so my advice is to limit that and don't argue with people unless you absolutely have to.

Szymon - Last but not least. Ultimately, your vote-off came down to Sam realizing he had a better shot against me than you (which you said was vice versa had you won) so I think my advice for you is to downplay your game as much as possible in the house but play it up at finale/end of the game. This could help you get over that inevitable hump of being targeted late-game.

(sorry this was so late!)