Board Thread:Survivor 42: Mexico/@comment-35825417-20200110133129/@comment-36835108-20200110233541

on paper, some people may deserve to be at the end more. for example, monty and angel (among many others). its really all based on perspective because each jury member values something different, and thats perfectly okay. but in my eyes, no jury member should be in my place. everyone that is on the jury got voted out for one reason or another. maybe the more deserving people fell short, but that is likely because they became too big of a threat. i managed my own threat level more effectively, and that's why im not on the jury myself. i got myself to the end by having the proper connections and being able to win the immunities that guaranteed my positioning. i really dont mean for this to be a cop out, i just think by the simple rules of survivor, outwit outplay and outlast, why should someone on jury "deserve" to be in my place? they failed the task at hand, and i mean that with the utmost respect because it's a hard game to play. i hope you understand my answer and reasoning. thank u