Board Thread:Survivor 26: Chaos/@comment-31555005-20170827104526/@comment-31555005-20170827123016

I never said I was the lowkey secretive controller, but neither were you. Those words were in reply to you saying that I basically just sheeped the vote and that you were some sort of mastermind behind it, which is false. The idea of an Aras vote had been thrown around for ages before it actually happened, his perception was that of a threat, and people waited for an opportunity to make it happen at some point (myself included). Him losing immunity for once was the right trigger.

Yes, you did. We also went on a Skype call at some point during the merge when we talked about how we should take out Aras and David soon. All of this DID happen. My problem with what you've been saying is that according to you, the Aras vote-out was completely your idea/plan. It wasn't. For starters, I'd argue that Emily, Alex and I (at least) were already more or less planning to vote him out at some point in order to prevent him beasting his way to the end (all independent lines of thinking, though I think I did talk with Alex about it once or twice, I'm not sure).

Yes, Jake brought Alex up first. It's clear from the 1 on 1 convos I had with him. At one point, Jake literally asked me if we should vote Alex or Aras and I clearly said Aras (because it was a good move which I wanted to make happen, and because I knew about Alex's advantage). And that's funny, the bit about Emily - she told me after the David vote that she'd be worried that Aras could beast his way to the end. Maybe I was impossible to talk with, who knows? But she did bring it up.