Board Thread:Survivor 42: Mexico/@comment-35875691-20200111021721

im going to put as much effort into my jury speech as was put into conversations with me by most of this game <3

1 - cole - i can't deny your strategic game was solid and you have a  sort of overdog/underdog meshed story on paper with numbers. however, survivor at the end of the day is about socializing, making friends, and telling an entertaining story. how do you respond to allegations and claims that you are, "Boring", "Like Talking to a Brick Wall", "Have No personality", "Dry", "stratbot", etc.

2 - lynn - you are the opposite of cole. you embody entertainment, personality, and the social game. but on the strategic end of things, while you definitely had a presence, i feel there are times where it could be seen like you just got lucky and sort of bumbled yourself into the top. Are there any alliances, bonds, or groups, that YOU initiated and sought after for specific strategic reasons, or was it just you happening to be sought out by others?

3 - michelle - in your opening speech you claim your shining point was the social game. so i just want to ask, what kind of social game is a social game where You never initiate conversation with me, always give me dry one word responses, literally hardly speak, and don't try to get to know me on a personal level at all? i can't speak for others here but i felt like i was putting in as much effort as possible just to get a single one word response from you, whereas my conversations with lynn and cole were much easier, even if cole didn't get in depth or social with me at all, he at least talked strategy. can you give me examples of where you ACTUALLY played the social game? 