Board Thread:Survivor 39: Poveglia/@comment-72.141.7.170-20190604000111/@comment-38856411-20190605154234

So Jordan said this in his response and I would like to respond:

"However that being said there were little things I did to just ensure that I had a slight edge over my competition. I’m sure you’ve noticed by now as a jury that Devin is very much claiming he was my dream final 2 and that I must be lying to Scott, but that’s only a half truth. Knowing early on in the game that Scott didn’t really like Devin (Devin’s straight I understand) and that led to a bit of animosity between them at merge. The fact that they were both my final 2’s, it made it easy for me to be able to to further the divide, but just occasionally dropping the tidbit of info that the other was upset at them or didn’t like them or whatever, always seeming like I wanted to bridge the gap between them but in actuality only trying to further it as much as possible. Due to this I was able to send them pretty similar ideas knowing they wouldn’t be close enough to compare notes and realize a lot of what I was telling them was the same."

Jordan is claiming that both Scott and I were his final 2s. I would like to draw your attention to another statement that Jordan made in a jury response to Scott:

"Final 4 would have had to be the round to make the decision, if I am being honest with myself and knowing now that Jackson will win immunity at final 4, while I want to believe I would have went with you and got you further, I don’t know if I could have justified voting for Devin that round with the game he played and I think I might have voted for you at final 4."

So which is it Jordan? You can't retroactively claim that Scott was your final 2 but also admit that you would have cut him at 4. A true final 2 keeps their word to their partner no matter what. I'm not claiming that you have to to stick to all the final 2s that you make, but if you're partner intends on cutting you before they get to the end, they can't also lean on the final 2 as an argument as to why they were loyal to you. Jordan's blatantly trying to play to Scott's ego and assure him that he was more aligned with him than he was with me. But the truth of the matter is that in the actualy course of the game and Jordan's hypothetical version of the game, Scott does not get close to the final 2, so don't try to use sell Scott a polished turd. Jordan can claim that he was closer to Scott till the cows come home but the history and Jordan's own words prove otherwise

Also can we talk about how Jordan is blatantly admitting to using personal grudges and sexuality as weapons in the game? I don't know about some of you, but that crosses over a line that I feel is better not crossed in this game. This is the side of the game that rubs me the wrong way the most. I am a little disappointed in Jordan for this, because I thought we were really friends, but it turns out he was manipulating people to create hate, not game mistrust. I had love and respect for everyone in this game and would never try to create a personal vendetta like that for game benefit. I considered Jordan one of my closest friends in the game, but if he was doing this kind of stuff to me behind my back, what kind of stuff did he say about the other members of the jury?