Board Thread:Survivor: Australia (Season 4)/@comment-4600940-20150109022902

Tommy:

In this game, the only possible worth I saw you as was to be a goat in the FTC. It looks like my expectations have played out well. In the swapped situation, you had no idea what was going on. You assumed that a girl would've been the boot as we were seen as a weaker tribe, and because we were dysfunctional as hell (tell me if you assumed different, but your reaction with Wesley showed enough that if you say different, you're contridicting yourself.)

I'm going to be honest with you. I see you as a try hard. You constantly try to be someone you're not - in this situation, you tried to be a lowkey mastermind, "playing the game to their fullest extent." Obviously this was not the case, as you said "#blindside" in the After the Dark chat after my vote-off. This just shows that you just wanted to be seen as a player who "orchrestrated" moves. In your moves, you have to be smart when making them. Do not just think about your "reception" you'll get from the viewers. You also forgot a very important aspect in the game (shocker); Jury management. You had to be reminded by Nuno that I was a juror to say sorry, and you never kept a good stable relationship with all of them. Obviously you weren't good with Jennifer, Luke, Mikayla and I. That's 4/7. You're potentially ruining your shots at winning because you sucked at keeping an in-game friendship.

Marco:

I only saw you as a player after Miguel's vote off. Before that, you didn't do anything. It looked like you were really inactive, and out of the loop. The first tribal council you jeopardized your alliance by voting for the wrong person. In the swap, you did as told and didn't show any signs of an individual game. That gameplay is not worthy of being rewared the title of Sole Survivor, but fortunately, you have been put in a good situation (for you) being next to Tommy. At the moment, I think I need to congratulate you for winning this game because I'm doubtful Tommy is going to pull off a win with Luke and Mikayla already murdering him in their previous speeches, and Jennifer accusing Tommy of talking to Luke and I about the game. [oh I'm addressing that btw in the end of this speech so :~)]

The thing is, you could've been the best winner on this ORG had you lived up to all your potential in the beginning (tbh I feel like Domonique is forever holding that spot of best winner tho with y'all in the finals) If you contributed to the game in the beginning, I would have no problem voting you.

But anyways, here are my questions.

1) Both: Name one flaw of each juror (in-game only).

2) Both: Why should the other finalist win instead of you?

3) Both: Why would you let Mikayla get as far as she did? She was obviously the biggest jury threat.

4) Tommy only: Do you really think that you should win? Like, genuinely believe you can get 4 votes or more from the jury?

5) Marco only: Do you think your inactivity benefited you in anyway?

Oh, and Jennifer, I'm 100% sure you made up a lie about Luke and I cheating to help get you out so that you could be seen as someone who was "screwed" out of the game, and not naturally voted off. Sorry, not sorry, you were voted off with no cheating. Don't make lies up so that Tommy could have a lower chance of winning. I didn't want him to win, but I'd never go that far to still accuse him of cheating even after screenshots were provided that showed your accusation was not accurate. Like at all.

 