Board Thread:Survivor: Siem Reap (Season 13)/@comment-24098415-20151211125634/@comment-8249209-20151211190744

I tried to answer this in French and was swiftly reminded why I passed French with a C- in high school. So I'm going to stick to english so I don't screw up my wording.

If I was gone, as a survivor nerd I think my ideal final two would've been like a huge threat against a huge threat. So something like Julian vs Jake or Andy would be cool to see. Kandal vs Palin, fight till the death to see who comes out on top. I am always up for an exciting finish in orgs, and that would probably be as awesome as the rest of them.

But if I get out of my complete nerd brain for a second, I think it would be something like Julian and Nathan. I worked with both these guys closely when it came to this game, and I think it would've been interesting to see the juries reactions to both their games. On the one hand, Julian played a great social game, got along with everyone, and won a ton of immunities. But maybe he'd be seen as hiding behind immunities, never really needing to fight to stay in. On the other hand there's Nathan, who never had that protection, he had a good social game, but played much more under the radar, and he was never seen as the huge threat that Julian was, but juries might respect that.

I just think it would be cool, but personally that might be just me. The merge was all pretty great, so I think a mixture of like anyone in the final two would've made for an awesome finish.