Board Thread:Survivor: Siem Reap (Season 13)/@comment-26030880-20151212012357/@comment-8249209-20151212025625

All I would have done differently is change my social game, talk more. I know at this point I probably sound like a broken record, but I know where I screwed up in this game. I didn't talk to people that I was voting out enough, I didn't get to know them or build a personal relationship, so they left the game pissed off at me. Of course it wasn't everyone. I'd talk to you and Alex more specifically, because you two are the ones that I really dropped the ball on. I'd be more social with everyone, but you two in particular. Aside from that, I wouldn't do anything differently. My physical and strategic game was good enough to get me to the final two next to the person that I want to be sitting next to. Changing any move I made would probably result in me going home eventually, so I wouldn't. That might sound cocky, I don't know, but every move made was important, and again, it got me to the end, so I did something right I guess.

As for your second question, I'm down to not sugar coat, candied jalapenos are only plesant for a second anyway. The four that would least deserve to be on the jury are Stephane, you, Andy and Julian. You might see this answer as a cop-out, or boring, but half of survivor is to get to the end, play 39 days, the other jurors played more days, so in that portion of the game, they earned the jury more.

Hope my answers help your decision.