Board Thread:Survivor: Japan (Season 6)/@comment-4975295-20150315145043/@comment-5480706-20150315181350

The logic of gameplay, as a juror I base my vote in gameplay as in this game you have to make moves to win. From a blindside, to an idol play, to winning a challenge. You have to make a big move that shakes the game. Lucas never did one of those big moves, I did them and so did you. Think, if you were in my position, you and I had similar gameplays, we did moves and we pissed off people. How would you feel when the jury says to you, I am voting the person who didnt make moves because they didnt piss me off, when in all honesty, Lucas didnt piss off people because he didnt go for it, he didnt want to make moves, his social gameplay is poor, he didnt win a challenge and he didnt do a big move. I see this as for example an art competition where a painting that isnt that pretty but had tons of time invested on it loses to a blank canvas.

And the fact that Lucas wasnt targetted because he was not a threat to win, unlike you, Will, Austin, Richie, Wes and other people. Being targetted is bad but is good at the same time because it shows people are scared of you, you know how it feels because you were voted out twice, you felt how people wanted you gone cause you were an obstacle to them, you could tackle them and win. Had you survived the target I placed on you in the final four youd be showing it off to the jury, you escaped the target when you returned from redemption. Also you use the fact that Lucas is European to excuse him from not talking at times, when Im also European, hell we are in the same timezone and I was social and talked to people. So yeah...