Board Thread:Survivor: Visayas (Season 18)/@comment-28398744-20160803034838/@comment-26868592-20160803060816

Hi, Ben

My strategic game was focused on getting to find a majority alliance. I got close to Tim just enough to get true and false informations to use against him and blindside him. Then the Jimmy vote.

I Constantly thought about numbers for the merge and tried to find a 5th person for the alliance which I created with Amir joining in. I had the final word on voting out Hieu which later got hacked up by an idol. Allying with Luke was a whole thing about trying to calm him down at first and his fights in the chat further made me realize that "He's good to me, so I can go on with him unlike other people"

I didn't want to make a move at Final 6, which was also important for me because I would've become a bigger target. I needed this alliance of 4 together to maybe final 5 because it would be made a difference and I wouldn't be in need for immunity.

Every other decision the group talked about. It totally benefitted me. Yes I didn't talk too much strategy there because I preferred doing it in person. I didn't need to be seen as big of a target or annoyed people with constant strategic talk. I'm trying to say is that I thought over and over about things in the game and created multiplease scenarios to help me strategize on my own which helped me on how to work with certain people.

As for Amir's speech. I dont think I'm undeserving to be here. I did play a good game. I might be upset that my game is considered to be undeserving, but I know how my game went and I know my journey. I'm trying hard to explain this to the Jury too. So for your question, yes, there could be underrating. Whether that comes from my speech or my perception in the game, I'll still try to explain my game here if you have any other questions.