Board Thread:Survivor: Chile (Season 7)/@comment-24772209-20150430093309/@comment-26059974-20150430214542

Tyler!!! I really loved talking to you and getting to know you, and I really did want to go deep in the game with you.. until I saw how big of a threat you were to me. Anyways onto your question..

Just a minor question, I would like to know  out of curiosity why you never took the time to work with me or strategize with me after Jessy's vote off??

It's simple. I felt like I could trust the alliance I had with Heather/Jace/Tyler P. more than I could with the Patos alliance, just because I mutinied previously, and I didn't know Eden/Fitz well enough at that point to put my trust into that alliance. Not only that, I couldn't see a scenario where having that alliance as the final 5 would work out for me, just because of how dominate and great of a player you really were! You had an amazing bond with Ali, which I saw during the premerge phase, and I feel like by that point you had a good bond with Fitz and possibly Eden too. I'm not saying they wouldn't have agreed to vote you out, but all you needed was 2 of them to vote with you, or maybe even win immunity! So at that point, I knew it was best to ride it out with my 4 person alliance, and make any possible moves I could later down the road with that. (This was probably a longer answer than you expect but I wanted to fully explain myself)

'''What attributes do you think you have that put you in the seat you're in right now that I don't have that put me over here where I'm standing? '''

I think laying low is what brought me to this point. You were dominate, and that's why people wanted you out to bad. I was apart of big moves in the game, but I didn't make myself the center of attention. (For instance, your argument with Jessy. That made you stand out to people in this game.) I think had you laid low during the premerge phase, you might not have been seen as such a target going into the merge, and you probably could have worked your way around minority!

Also, give me one reason why the person next to you does     not      '''deserve to win this game. As well as one reason why one member of the jury (anyone you want) does not deserve to be the sole survivor of this game.'''

Okay, I don't want to come off as rude, but the biggest reason why at this point Jace doesn't deserve to win this game is because a lot of his speech was...bologna. I mean as funny as that may sound, he wasn't exactly truthful. That or he was just so unaware of what was really happening in this game. I think he credited himself for moves that other people (including myself) made in this game. He kept pointing out stuff he did, when he really wasn't the one behind it.

Now, I hate to say this because I truly love him as a person, but Ali doesn't deserve to be the sole survivor. I don't think he had the best strategic game, and he was even worse than me in challenges. (At least I got 2nd in a few of them.) Other than that, I think he played a good social game? Others may beg to differ, but he was nice to everyone, and really was a lovely person to talk to.