Board Thread:Survivor 42: Mexico/@comment-150.116.217.226-20200110143435/@comment-36835108-20200110235407

hi odd! your question is neat. below is my list and my reasoning:

1. monty - monty is first because he was strategic, social, and physical. well rounded, and i really enjoyed talking to him. he did have a downfall with winning too many too soon but i think overall he had the strongest game and would've won a jury vote easily.

2. angel - he played a dominant strategic game, executing what he wanted to happen. even though hes a bit rude to me in these questions, i cant lie. he had a strong game and i think had i gone out fourth he could have gotten my vote, even if he wasnt the most likeable at times. strategy is important!

3. landen - landen played good strategically too and popped off a lot, which was fun but lead to his demise. i love the exposes but... i think it hurt his game so he ranks lower than monty and angel. still a strong contender tho.

4. lynn - i rank myself fourth because my game wasnt as appealing as the three above, but i feel like i came into clutch when i needed to and had the proper connections to never get voted out. i had social capital over michelle at times and consciously made decisions to not be a big, immediate threat.

5. julian - julian had social connections with a handful of people, and i found him fun to talk to. he was one of the only people in the game who was in danger and actually reached out to me, so i think that gives him brownie points.

6. cole - cole is also nice but i think he had good enough friends to not rank low, even though i dont find his game too impressive. i just think he was there, as i have said before. he didn't make an impression on me but perhaps thats just with me

7. michelle - i love michelle so much.. a queen!! but i feel like i had to explain a lot of moves to her and convince her, such as the angel vote at final four. she's super nice but i feel like i had more strategic awareness in our game relationship, and she didnt have agency.

8. odd - you may have been strategic, but with me i felt like i didnt get much back in return. and yes, communication is a two way street but i felt like our connection wasn't super strong.

9. logan - logan and i didnt really have much of a connection, and he left early merge. to me, talking strategy was a bit difficult, so to me he ranks a bit lower.

10. najim - najim was a merge boot because of a silly mistake so i didnt really get to see his game, and he played his idol wrong. thats why hes low ):

11. aaron - aaron was inactive compared to the rest in my opinion, and was voted out twice. sure that's fine and he wasn't bad and he's nice but i think that is a detriment with his game.